Home Science
I. Demonstration of performance of triple layered hermetic storage bags for storing of rice, redgram dhal, groundnut and horsegram
Post-harvest losses are a significant concern, reaching as high as 36%. Insects are the major cause of dry matter loss; however, improper grain drying often results in damage by storage fungi and the risk of mycotoxin accumulation. The majority of smallholder farmers use traditional methods to handle and store their grain after harvest. Solar drying is effective, but it is often difficult toattain the targeted grain moisture when weather conditions are not favorable. Storage of the grain in wovenbags is inexpensive but requires the application of insecticide .Farmers have become more aware of the potential health issues associated with these insecticides, especially when the grain isstored within the home.
Technology Assessed:
T1: Farmers method
T2:Triple layer hermetic storage system (Perdue
Induced Crop Storage bags (PICS)
Critical inputs given: Pest free triple layer hermetic bags(PICS)
Results: Table :1Performance of triple layered hermetic storage bags
Germination % |
Demo |
Control |
Demo |
Control |
Demo |
Control |
Demo |
Control |
Demo |
Control |
1st month |
2ndmonth |
3rd month |
4th month |
5th month |
||||||
Red gram |
92 |
78 |
88 |
75 |
88 |
70 |
88 |
60 |
86 |
55 |
Paddy |
94 |
85 |
90 |
80 |
90 |
80 |
86 |
80 |
83 |
75 |
Horse gram |
90 |
85 |
90 |
85 |
89 |
83 |
88 |
80 |
88 |
80 |
Loss of weight |
Demo |
Control |
Demo |
Control |
Demo |
Control |
Demo |
Control |
Demo |
Control |
1st month |
2ndmonth |
3rd month |
4th month |
5th month |
||||||
Redgram |
11.76 |
13.50 |
11.70 |
13.50 |
11.50 |
14.50 |
11.48 |
14.50 |
11.36 |
14.65 |
Paddy |
9.5 |
12.3 |
9.5 |
12.5 |
9.5 |
12.5 |
9.5 |
13.3 |
9.8 |
13.5 |
Horsegram |
9.3 |
10.5 |
9.3 |
10.5 |
9.5 |
10.5 |
9.8 |
11.3 |
9.5 |
12.4 |
Grain storage under hermetic conditions reducedinsect infestation, grain weight loss and discoloration. and drudgery was recorded minimum on frequent cleaning and storing of grains. Labour charges for cleaning of grains was reduced.
II. Cotton knitted hand gloves for harvesting the vegetable crops (bendi & brinjal)
Harvesting of vegetable crops and fodder causes cuts,rashes on hands and ultimately causes irritation, allergies, and black patches on hands.
Women are experiencing drudgery while harvesting vegetables. It includes Allergies, skin scratches, thorn picks and wounds
The Cotton knitted hand gloves were demonstrated in 10 locations.
T1- Famers following regular practice
T2 – Farmers using cotton knitted hand gloves
Critical inputs given: Cotton knitted gloves
Results: Difficulty score was high before intervention (40% difficulty, 20% very difficult and 40% moderate level) and after intervention difficulty score was very less using cotton knitted hand gloves. (80%).
Drudgery index (DI) scorebetween 70 &above = Maximum drudgery
Drudgery index (DI) scorebetween50&70 = Moderate drudgery
Drudgery index (DI) scorebetween50&below = Minimum drudgery
Front Line Demonstrations
FLD 1: Drudgery reducing implement for weeding in groundnut with wheel hoe
Groundnut is a major crop in KVK Kalikiri adopted villages especially in kharif season. Weeding is a major problem to the farm women. The farm women sit in squatting position. This increases drudgery leading to back pain and fatigue. The work output is also low and it demands more labour and time. The availability of labour is also a major problem in western mandals of Chittoor district. In view of the prevailing problems, KVK Kalikiri has conducted front line demonstration on drudgery reducing implement for weeding in groundnut with wheel hoe.
T1: Using of drudgery reducing implement i.e. wheel hoe
T2: Farmers method i.e. hand hoe
No. of locations: 10
S.No |
Parameters of observation |
Improved technology |
Conventional tool/practice |
% change due to technology |
1 |
Work done area |
0.4ha |
0.4ha |
- |
2 |
Drudgery score (30) |
22 |
26 |
13 |
3 |
Labour employed |
9 |
21 |
57 |
4 |
Labour wages |
Rs.1,350/day @ 150/labour/day |
Rs.3,150/day @ 150/labour/day |
57 |
5 |
Economic benefit/ season in ground nut |
1350×1= 1,350 |
3,150×1=3,150 |
57 |
6 |
No.of users preferring the technology |
13 |
7 |
- |
It can be concluded from the above Table that, weeding with wheel hoe has reduced drudgery 13% compared to farmers’ practice. Total number of labour required for weeding with wheel hoe was 23 mebers per ha, whereas it was 53 members per ha in farmers practice and Labor wages reduced by Rs.4500/- per ha.
FLD 2.Introducing Rajasri birds as back yard poultry (Rabi, 2014-15)
Malnutrition and nutrition deficiencies are the main constraints in villages of Kalikiri mandal. Egg is considered to be reference protein as it contains all the essential amino acids. So to increase the health and nutritional status of the individuals consumption of eggs must be encouraged as it contains qualitative proteins. In addition to supply of nutrients, they also provide some additional income by selling the left over after consumption. Hence to achieve this backyard poultry farming needs to be encouraged.
T1: Rajasri birds.
T2: Local poultry birds
S.No |
Back yard poultry |
Egg laying started (days) |
No. of eggs laid per bird (up to 36 weeks) |
Average Body weight |
|
Hen (kg) |
Cock (kg) |
||||
1 |
Rajasri birds |
160 |
70-80 |
1.6 - 2.0 |
2.0 - 2.5 |
2 |
Desi birds |
210 |
20-30 |
1.8 - 2.5 |
2.0 - 3.5 |
Consumption of eggs and chicken was increased after distribution of rajasri birds and farm women also got additional income by sale of eggs.
During 2015-16 also Rajasri birds were distributed as back yard poultry at 10 locations in KVK adopted villages.
FLD 03. Demonstration of Mango Harvesters Designed by IIHR(2014-15)
Mango is one of major horticultural crops in western mandals of Chittoor district. Manual plucking of fruits is generally followed by the farmers but it is cumbersome and not possible to pluck the fruit at end of branches. Further, the tree branches are shaken to speed up the harvesting, which results in post harvest losses due to physical damage. Hence demonstrations to show the performance of IIHR mango harvester were conducted.
T1 : Using IIHR Designed Mango Harvester
T2 : Farmers practice (locally designed harvesters)
S.No |
Parameters observed |
Improved technology |
Conventional practice |
01 |
No.of fruits harvested /hr |
660 |
780 |
02 |
Fruit damage |
No damage |
5-10 /per 100 fruits |
03 |
Heart beat |
90-100bpm |
95-102bpm |
04 |
Pulse rate |
75-80bpm |
85-95bpm |
Observations:
- Decreased fruit damage.
- The diameter of the rim of IIHR harvester is small and hence less number of fruits could be harvested compared to locally designed harvester.
Minikit Trials |
Minikits
Discipline |
Title |
Treatments |
No. of locations |
Status |
Crop production |
Groundnut |
TCGS-1073 |
03 |
Crop yet to be harvested |